This is a modification from a response to a dude bagging on training styles.
It's modified to make more sense as a blogpost. (http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1503842_Chris_Costa_has_a_new_grip__Has_anyone_seen_this___.html&page=2 for the actual response and hilarity that is ARF) So, you know, deal with it.
I joined the Marines in 2000, and was introduced to using a magwell grip
during the MOUT package at ITB in SOI by our lead instructor, who
previously had been part of SOTG's MOUT/CQB cadre.
We used it exclusively for that. That training and use and instruction
went on through the fleet and other MOUT/CQB instruction packages.
Probably because as Infantry we were training to fight in said style.
The level of training
received by students is directly influenced by the motivation of the
instructors. You can get a guy that wants to just put checks in boxes,
or you can have an instructor like I did that is excited about what he
knows, and wants to share it and crank out bad asses. What I learned in
my MOUT package in SOI to this day is roughly what is still done by SF
and SoF units. They have a lot more "flow" and less set piece stuff
going on, but the fundamentals are still very similar. (There was an
incident a long while back about training in the early days of the GWOT,
where had the person had the same training I did, their life would be a
lot different, and the shit thing, our roles could have been easily
Now lets look at training, and push back to new concepts.
In research and development, sometimes you have to try shit you know
doesn't work, or don't think it will work in order to move on.
Sometimes you get a surprise, and find out things actually DO work well (Sometimes it fails when you thought it was working too, never know).
Having grown up a rather FUDD existence shooting, the magwell grip BLEW
MY MIND. So quick, so snappy. You could have the muzzle down, bust a
corner pop up and slay targets in heartbeats. Later as a civvie the "magpul" grip hit the public eye and I thought "phht gay,
magwell grip is the way to go".
Because that's what I learned. So I was defensive.
Then a buddy told me to try it, and it dawned on me, as an
instructor I had been telling people for about a year that "be open to
new concepts, try new things, don't stagnate... adapt or die".
So I tried it, and became a better shooter because of it (in the role it's meant for).
If it wasn't for trying new styles, experimenting, and pushing the state
of the art, we'd still be shooting pistols with one hand, because using
two hands is for women, and shooting rifles like we're on the offhand
stage of a highpower match.
TL;DR Everyone should try shit before they bag on it, and just because you learned one way, doesn't mean it's the best way. Stand by for a part two as the thread motivates me to write.(I'll prob clean this up in the morning too)